<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lex what?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tenclay.org/blog/2005/07/20/lex-what/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tenclay.org/blog/2005/07/20/lex-what/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:58:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julio</title>
		<link>http://tenclay.org/blog/2005/07/20/lex-what/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Julio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 13:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenclay.org/blog/2005/07/20/lex-what/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Yes, excellent post!&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;This _sententia_ is indeed circular, as every self-respecting sencond-year Latin student knows. It is precisely the ceasless interplay between dogma and worship that is the point here: as the Puritans so rightly intuited, true worship and true dogma go hand in hand because their intersection produces whole Christian persons (one might call this formative intersection the &quot;lex vivendi&quot;). But add anything aberrant to the mix, and the results will be not only catastrophic, but also self-perpetuating, as you well note. (By the way, St Irenaeus also echoes the thrust of the _sententia_ when he writes: &quot;Our opinion is in conformity with the Eucharist, and the Eucharist confirms our&lt;BR/&gt;opinion&quot;.)&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;The Lordship of Jesus Christ makes a claim on the entirety of life, and indeed nothing in them can be considered as spiritually insignificant. But the failure to recognize this is not only a problem of our society; I believe it is inherent to our fallen brokenness. Those of us from Christian Traditions such as Eastern Orthodoxy, with its canons and fasting and feasting, often mistake these means for the end; others have different temptations. The final goal is union with Christ, as St Paul so often emphasizes, yet the path to this integral wholeness is never easy. But then, &quot;it is through many trials and tribulations that we must enter the Kindgdom of God&quot; (cfr. Acts 14:22).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, excellent post!</p>
<p>This _sententia_ is indeed circular, as every self-respecting sencond-year Latin student knows. It is precisely the ceasless interplay between dogma and worship that is the point here: as the Puritans so rightly intuited, true worship and true dogma go hand in hand because their intersection produces whole Christian persons (one might call this formative intersection the &#8220;lex vivendi&#8221;). But add anything aberrant to the mix, and the results will be not only catastrophic, but also self-perpetuating, as you well note. (By the way, St Irenaeus also echoes the thrust of the _sententia_ when he writes: &#8220;Our opinion is in conformity with the Eucharist, and the Eucharist confirms our<br />opinion&#8221;.)</p>
<p>The Lordship of Jesus Christ makes a claim on the entirety of life, and indeed nothing in them can be considered as spiritually insignificant. But the failure to recognize this is not only a problem of our society; I believe it is inherent to our fallen brokenness. Those of us from Christian Traditions such as Eastern Orthodoxy, with its canons and fasting and feasting, often mistake these means for the end; others have different temptations. The final goal is union with Christ, as St Paul so often emphasizes, yet the path to this integral wholeness is never easy. But then, &#8220;it is through many trials and tribulations that we must enter the Kindgdom of God&#8221; (cfr. Acts 14:22).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey</title>
		<link>http://tenclay.org/blog/2005/07/20/lex-what/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 02:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tenclay.org/blog/2005/07/20/lex-what/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Ooh, good title!  Welcome to blog-world.  Excellent post as well...since we are (as much as we try not to be) whole, integrated beings, the segments of our life are bound to inform and shape one another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooh, good title!  Welcome to blog-world.  Excellent post as well&#8230;since we are (as much as we try not to be) whole, integrated beings, the segments of our life are bound to inform and shape one another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

